SPACE – MATTER – MOTION – HUMAN BEINGS  (A challenge without formulae) Science cries out for new physics, new transportation technologies, a new theory of information, a unified field theory etc. Yes, it does. But it is not easy to figure out how to get them. The formulae exist but people"s perceptions of them need to be reworked so that the formulae are tailored to the realities of Life and the Universe. The simplest but also one of the most fundamental examples of reworking people"s understanding and awareness of an already existing formula is the case with the most frequently used velocity formula. The current understanding is that velocity equals the path over time. The truth of Life and the Universe is not the same. It is that velocity is the ratio of two paths (two motions), of which in the numerator is the path we can measure, and in the denominator is the path, taken as a reference measuring unit, with respect to which we commensurate all other paths (motions) in the Universe. According to this new formula, time does not really exist as a physical quantity. The idea, grounded in human consciousness as a notion of time, is a fundamental fallacy. Understanding this kind of truth is a challenge for humans, and physicists in particular, on their path to the truth.  A LITTLE HISTORY My name is Ventsislav Dolzhikov and I am a doctor in a polyclinic in Bulgaria in the city of Plovdiv. I am not a physicist but I can take a look at physics as a side observer.  I am writing to you with the conscious intention to help you, and ask you to help me accomplish a very interesting and important task. The task is to "open the door to heaven." A few years ago a member of the Balkanski family - circus performers, owners of the world-famous „Balkanski Circus", came to me. In an informal conversation, he said they had worked for many years in the USA. During one of those years, NASA invited them to demonstrate their patented circus number, called “The Globe of Death". To my question what was the reason for this invitation, the member of the Balkanski family could not give a clear answer. However, I gave him one: for years in the USA, Russia, China, India, Germany, France, Japan, etc., it is known that the rocket technology is outdated and unsuitable for the full and pragmatic mastery and seizure of the Solar system, or, metaphorically speaking, for "opening the door to heaven". And each of these countries is striving to develop new transport technologies - for reactionless movement. A direct and recent example of this is Russia"s Yubileiny Program 2008, in which one of the experimental engines was Gravitsapu (inertial in nature). This program ended in failure due to misunderstanding of the nature of gravity. The scientist who had bet his name for it - Gen. Menshikov - was rejected by the Russian academic community as a disseminator of pseudo-science. However, the truth, from my point of view, is, that it is he who was principally right, not those, who affixed the label "pseudo-science" to his development. For centuries, people have been unable to understand gravity - what it is and what it brings to Life and the Universe. Historically, closest to understanding it were two scientists: Archimedes, with the discovery of the indirect gravitational force, symbolically named after him - Archimedes Force; and Newton, with the discovery of the direct gravitational force. After those scholarly men, who have made over the millennia, the understanding of gravity has moved away from the objective truth.   INERTIAL TECHNOLOGY Many technologies have been developed for reactionless space travel, but the only ones that make real sense for the future mastery of the Solar system and the Universe are the inertial ones. The reason why such an effective technology cannot be created, is the outdated theoretical base of science and its true foundation - physics. In Bulgaria I have participated in lectures, in which my teacher and I tried to show technicians/mechanics the errors in the theoretical base that hinder the creation of technical facilities based on new physical principles. Unfortunately, they rely on the claims of physicists that this is impossible, and the things with the new technology end there. To move on, a paradigm shift is needed. Without true understanding of the essence of gravity, we will not understand how to create a technology for moving in the cosmic space and changing orbits without reactive thrust. There are phenomena in chemistry (which is actually physics), not completely possible to understand without any change in the theoretical base. The current understanding of catalysis and catalysts, for instance, is something like a "free lunch." From my perspective, this is a violation of the law of energy conservation but such a miracle does not exist, has never existed and will never exist. The understanding of the essence of life and of cancer as its manifestation, is also related to understanding the action of catalysts, but let us get back to the subject of this exposition.  Inertial technology cannot be created purely empirically. Fragments of it, however, can and have been created. Nevertheless, a fully completed technology does not exist yet. Without a change in the fundamental concepts of the theoretical base of science, there will be no practical advances in technology. In order to arrive at an inertial technology, a practical experiment must be set up to prove the conditions for non-conservativeness of the gravitational field of the Earth, as well as the gravitational field of any other material object. Such an experiment can be set up and defended as conclusions and reality.  GRAVITY AND FRAGMENTS OF A NEW THEORETICAL BASE The current understanding of gravity is that it is one of the four fundamental interactions in nature and a function of the curved space-time around large masses. According to physics, it is a weak interaction. In my view, gravity is a very strong interaction, and what makes it look weak is the particular reactive type of force effect on the bodies in it. The world around us and we ourselves, are made of three things: matter, space and motion (mass, volume, internal and external motion). They are eternal, endless and storable. Combining time with space is wrong, because time is a dimension of motion, and space is the true essence and infinity, it is the volume, the empty space. Broadly speaking: volume is a parameter of space, mass is a parameter of matter, and motion has many parameters - path, velocity, acceleration, time. Due to the proportionality of gravity as a force to the material content in a material structure, we can measure the material content of different structures in gravity fields using scales and similar technical equipment for measuring weight. Matter and space are absolute in nature, i.e., they are the same with respect to all reference frames in terms of quantity. One cube of space and one pound of matter will always be one cubic meter of space and one pound of matter, regardless of the perspective. There is no space shrinkage in the massive objects. Their structures, i.e., their matter and motion consolidate, while space remains an infinite void. Unlike matter and space, motion is always relative. There is no „absolute motion“- а concept, related to the limiting velocity of light. Motion is not the same with respect to the different reference frames. It is always different for the different observers. Matter, space and motion are indivisible, and this predetermines the fact that physics does not truly understand them in their full value.  Gravity is a sum of energy flows around the material objects, whether planetary in nature or micro-objects, such as atoms, molecules, electrons, protons, etc. In fact, all the four physical interactions are a mimicking gravity. On a micro level, energy flows, proportional to the area of the objects, are involved. Reactive energy flows, such as gravity, are proportional to the material content of the objects, and this is what makes it so difficult to truly understand the electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear interactions as a function of the gravitational interaction. Every language, even the mathematical one and the one, based on 0 and 1, is grounded on people"s understandings, and these understandings are difficult to change. It is difficult to explain that the basic physical laws are the laws of conservation and they are grouped on three levels. All the other laws without exceptions are derivatives of the laws of conservation. On the first level is the law of conservation of the trinity of matter, motion and space - everything in the light of the day is from this trinity, in it and it is in everything. On this first and most fundamental level is only this law of conservation. There are three more conservation laws on the second level: 1. Law of conservation of motion (discovered by Lomonosov in a slightly more primitive but absolutely accurate form and conveniently forgotten by modern physics); 2. Law of conservation of matter - in fact, when Newton detected the inertia of matter, he, without fully realizing it, discovered the true face of matter - it is as material as motion and space; it is the real anti-force that manifests itself in the "action" of the motion; 3. Law of conservation of space – space is the void and the true continuum; it cannot be distorted, twisted, skipped, bypassed, pierced, extended, shrunk, created, destroyed, etc. What shrinks and expands into it are the structural forms of the matter, that is, motion and matter. The physical truth is even more complicated, because when, for example, a star consolidates at its death, what surrounds it is not the vacuum, but the gravity lattice, in which the amount of matter, space, and motion at any point, in the literal meaning of these words, borders on infinity. The law of energy conservation is only on the third level, just like the law of impulse conservation (Newton’s infinite velocity of gravity appears due to the incomprehension of the impulse as a physical quantity, as well as the increase in the mass to infinity with Einstein"s velocities, etc.). There are other laws of conservation that come from the combination of the three elements: matter, motion and space. And it is clear from the physical formulae that energy is a derivative of motion, represented by the squared velocity, and matter, represented by the mass. You can look at the basic formulae, the truest of which are the kinetic energy formulae. The only thing, missing in them, are the relative coefficients. Therefore, the distances of the Pioneers and Voyagers as they travel through the Solar system cannot be correctly calculated. Motion is always a relative value and this is its basic property. When present in formulae, such as the formulae of velocity, time, path, and acceleration, relative coefficients must be added. Accordingly, force and energy are relative quantities with respect to the various reference frames. Unless the next words and the preceding ones are well understood, a unified field theory will not be possible to create and understand. How to create such a theory, if it is not clear to physics that the field is made up of energy flows under all possible conditions and there are only two types of energy flows in the Universe: direct ones, which are proportional to the surface of the structure affected by them, such as wind, river-water flow, light, etc.; and reactive ones, which are proportional to the mass of the objects they affect, e.g. gravity and magnetic flows (but not electromagnetic ones). Gravity is an energy wind, whose relative velocity with respect to the Earth is 300,000 km per second. If this velocity was lower or higher, there would be phenomena of acceleration or deceleration of light, and modern physics would know that, but such phenomena have not been observed. Only distortion of the light energy flow around large masses is observed, though it is not due to the curved space-time, but to the exerted force by the gravitational wind on the photon, moving at an angle to that wind. The density of the gravitational wind is great, probably greater than that of iron, or even much greater, but, fortunately, because of the miniature size of its particles, this wind does not kill us. Gravitons are the least known thing in the light of the day. In my opinion, they are the "God particles", which the Collider is looking for but will not find; and the notion of "Higgs boson" is not satisfactory in the light of the conservation laws. Due to the property of the gravitational wind of being a reactive energy flow and its proportionality as a force effect on the material content of the objects in the gravitational field, in order to create conditions for non-conservativeness, the systems of the technical equipment must have a gravitationally justified variable volume and mass. This is not easy to achieve and therefore it has not been achieved in the course of the millennia. Nevertheless, people again and again frantically strive to do it. Inertial propulsion systems cannot be made without a paradigm shift as well. In spite of the fact that the gyroscopic systems have shown diversion in the Apollo"s paths to the moon. Until it is understood that everything in this world is moving in a material environment and is constantly subjected to material force effects, and that there is asymmetry around large masses in these force effects, we will not have truly reactionless moving systems. INTERESTING CONSEQUENCES AND EXPLANATIONS BY MEANS OF THE NEW THEORETICAL BASE Words that sound like common words are hard to believe; and without a practical experiment, you will not be able to believe them, but this is always the case with contradictions in the scientific paradigm. It is difficult to invest in such ideas, but in my view it is worth doing. Therefore, I make this effort to translate this exposition into English and send it to you, who are trying to "open the door to heaven". The consequences are very interesting and you have fragments of them as observations, but you do not have a full explanation, I suppose: Planets were not born of a dust cloud, they were literally born of stars - inside or beneath the star"s crown there are larger or smaller massive gravitational entities, which modern physics calls "black holes" (a motion picture is available in a YouTube material). They rotate continuously in the core of the star. They are the nucleus of the star, and they rarely collide with each other but when this happens on a large scale, and one of these centers of gravity receives sufficiently high velocity, it leaves the star, respectively, drawing normal matter from the plasma into the crown at the same time. Then it starts "wandering" in the given Solar system until it "finds" a suitable place/orbit. After that it cools and a solid planet is formed. Mankind has probably witnessed such a birth in its history - the legends of Nemesis and the wandering hypothetical planet Vulcan resemble such an astrophysical phenomenon. These massive objects in the core of the Sun are of different sizes. What we see on YouTube as circular black shadows on the crown, which "bite" plasma, are relatively small entities, though larger ones also exist. They predetermine the heterogeneity of its mass and, accordingly, the non-uniformity of its gravitational field; this non-uniformity (and not the curved space-time) predetermines the strange orbit of Mercury, in turn.  For large planets (gas giants), the center of gravity, forming their nuclei, is not just one, but several, which predetermines the gradual sputtering in the course of time of the complex atoms into single or twin protons, that is, into hydrogen and helium. Due to the existence of these centers of gravity in the core of the solid planets, we also have the inorganic genesis of oil and gas. There must be oil and gas on every planet in the Solar system. As far as it concerns the moon, its center of gravity has probably evaporated, so it "clinks" as a hollow object at landings and launches or in case of artificial or natural explosions. The moon should be a few zeros older than the Earth, not 2 billion years alone. The more you enter the depth of the Sun or every other star, the colder it will become. This is only part of the truth about the "crown (surface) of the Sun" paradox you are observing.  The nucleus, due to the drive for symmetrization of the structural forms of matter, must be even colder than the surface of the Sun. Due to the existence of many centers of gravity that make up the nuclei of the stars, we have mechanisms for self-feeding, i.e., migration of the complex atoms in depth and, correspondingly, their sputtering to protons, and then supplying the crown with hydrogen through the "black spots".  The "black spots" are huge tornadoes that not only provide the star"s crown with hydrogen, but also ensure the accelerating collision of protons and all kinds of atoms in it to fuel the fusion reaction. If the "black spot" is only one, as is the case with Jupiter (the so-called "red spot"), a star cannot be born because the thermonuclear fire cannot be ignited. In fact, the crown of the star is analogous to the atmosphere around the planets. This atmosphere must be large enough to accommodate enormous in area, huge in length and sufficient in number tornadoes in order to provide high-speed protons and neutrons to ignite the nuclear fire in the surface layers of the atmosphere of a gas giant so that it becomes a star. Of course, time is needed for the solid matter of the mantle and crust of the planet to turn into protons in the gravity mill, i.e., into hydrogen and helium, as with the gas giants. With these self-feeding mechanisms, the age of the stars must vary by more than 10-20 billion years.    There is something wrong about the understanding of the red and blue shifts in the light spectra of the Universe, but the reasons behind that are yet to be found from now on. And a great amount of data needs to be analyzed. The velocity of light is different with respect to the different reference frames. If simply the elements (mirrors and a light source) of the Michelson and Morley’s experiment were put in different reference frames, then the things would come into place.  The principle of Heisenberg"s uncertainty comes not from the dual nature of the "elementary" particles, i.e., corpuscle - wave, but from light velocities achieved at point-like distances. Everything is a corpuscle that moves everywhere in a material environment and produces wave energy flows.  The vacuum is not the space and it is not the Ether, either? The vacuum is an infinite lattice of gravitons, and at each point of it the amount of matter-space-motion is bounded by infinity. Against the background of these infinite energies, any photonic or universe-level material structure is like foam on the ocean. The vacuum seems like something inert and empty, because beyond the gravitational centers of the stars, planets and atoms, the force fronts of the incoming and outgoing energy flows are nullified. I will also give you an example, concerning Life itself (in fact, it concerns chemistry, biochemistry and biology of any class), as I am a doctor, after all. Living systems receive millions of times more energy through gravity than from food, light and any chemical or heat source, taken together. The current explanation of the catalysts and their most powerful agents – the enzymes - is "There is such thing as a free lunch." This phrase, in its opposite version - „There is no such thing as a free lunch" - is a modern American saying, which, in fact, is a paraphrase of the law of energy conservation, applied to the social environment. There is no way to speed up or slow down anything without exercising force and injecting or removing energy from the system. This law applies to both the stone and the sky, as well as to the chemical processes. While metal catalysts (iron, platinum, palladium, copper, etc.) use only the direct gravitational force, i.e., the one, discovered by Newton, the enzymes use both the force of Newton, and the indirect gravitational force, i.e., the one, discovered by Archimedes and which results from the action of the direct gravitational force on the material content of water or other fluid, through which it passes. The enzymes are more powerful therefore. This truth is connected with the truth about life and cancer, which, though a twisted life, is a life itself. Without this truth about the catalysts, there will be no cure for cancer. Wherever we are at the moment, in whatever position we are - lying, sitting, standing, running or flying in an airplane or a helicopter, from the surface of the Earth a wind blows with a velocity of 300 000 km/s and does not kill us. The complexity, named Life, could not exist according to the current understanding of the energy and information turnovers; hence, a new theory of information is needed. We only have two forces in the Universe in reality - two forces that are inextricably linked. These are the force of action, i.e., the motion, and the force of counteraction, i.e., the matter. These forces are best seen in the manifestations of gravity around the gravity centers. The force of action is the Newtonian force, and the force of counteraction is the Archimedean force, which is the inert response of the material content of water to the passage of a gravitational energy flow through it, i.e., in the event of an action. In fact, the Archimedean force is also manifested in the material environment of the crust and mantle of the planet, all the way to the core of the nucleus, where the symmetrator is located. However, due to the friction forces, which are more pronounced in a solid environment, the Archimedean force is difficult to observe. Things are even more interesting since what we see as gravity around stars and planets is actually the shadow of the gravity lattice. It seems like the gravity lattice in and around the material structures energizes them just like light bulbs, but does not create light  - it manifests itself in the form of the well-known gravity, i.e., the origin of gravity is not in the gravity center, it is outside it  - in the so called vacuum.  The forces of action and counteraction create both the direct and reactive energy flows. And the direct and reactive energy flows give rise to all four interactions known in physics - gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear and weak nuclear interactions. There is no anti-gravity, it has never been and never will be. Gravity is the unidirectional embodiment of the inverse vector. The communication in the Universe is in the gravitational range and therefore no matter if we listen with our both ears - they will not contact us. I do not know how modulations occur in a reactive energy flow, but they do occur and they are the carriers of the real information in space. They go in a straight line and nothing can stop them.  Singularity, or, in other words, the event horizon, does not exist. What we think builds the event horizon, is gravity, which is the greatest "gossiper" of Eternity. It imports and exports information anywhere and everywhere. The neutrinos can be stopped, but the graviton - never.  Life - through the enzymes - sucks in huge amounts of energy from gravity and the gravity lattice and when we start using the gravity range, we will see that fact clearly; without a shadow of doubt we will see where there is or there is no life around, and what level it is on. As it concerns us, humans, the alien observers, who have mastered gravity, will know for sure who we are and on what level of development we are. No need to come in flesh and blood. There are exotic phenomena in the world of humans and science that, without changing the scientific paradigm and, respectively, people"s perceptions of gravity and of the two forces it carries during its passage through the material environment, as well as of the phenomena of catalysis and catalysts associated with it, these phenomena will not be understood and explained. These are: spontaneous human self-ignition, aqueous catalysts (substances that incomprehensibly make water combustible), phenomena of paradoxical and inexplicable cold fusion, crop circles (appearance of images, formed without human involvement, in fields, sown with various plants), and the phenomena of precognition and paranormality of different scale, etc. There are some things, directly concerning the USA, and these are the hurricanes and tornadoes. Without understanding the two gravitational forces (direct and indirect), acting around the planet"s surface during the passage of spirals through a gas fluid, these destructive phenomena will not be understood.   There are thousands of other consequences, which cannot be listed in a short exposition.    SETTING UP AN EXPERIMENT FOR NON-CONSERVATIVENESS OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, IN PARTICULAR, OF THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD OF THE EARTH   It is of utmost importance for modern science to understand that wherever we move - on Earth, and on Mars, and in vacuum - we will always move in a material environment, but this material environment contains infinite motion, i.e., energy, which means that it is not what the ancients understood as Ether. This is the first step toward: creation of new inertial transportation systems; extraction of energy unknown to mankind so far; understanding Life as a phenomenon and a process and finding out from where it (Life) draws energy to exist; and creation of the new physics. The simplest experiment to realize the non-conservative conditions of the gravitational field is to create a gravitational chain of systems of variable volume and mass, which, when placed in a vertical plane, will produce self-feeding motion. If you are interested in this topic, you can write to me - you will help me to complete my task and I will help you to complete your task and start the next one. Well, that is life, and only together we can "open the door to heaven." CONCLUSION The simplest thing about this world is how it is made: it is made on a programmatic cause-and-effect principle (software and hardware at one), as it follows: three infinities and eternities, such as matter, space and motion, form the extremes in the world of the structural forms of matter. The analogues from the programming world are: 0, for example, is the empty space, or the space; 1 is the filled space – the matter; and the programmer is the motion. These three properties are not only indeterminable as a language, be it words or mathematics, but they are also indeterminable in reality - you can neither add anything nor take something out of Eternity and Infinity. Eternity/Infinity essentially does not allow for the existence of another Eternity/Infinity. There are not many eternities and infinities, never have been, and never will be. The fact that many eternities and infinities appear on the linguistic level, even in the mathematical language, does not mean that they exist; it only means that a language is a closed system and as such it is limited. It cannot depict realities without describing them in relation to the real Life. You cannot discover the physical reality by means of the tip of a feather, though long ago Einstein thought you could. Combined, matter, space and motion, make the apparent limit of our world, and our world is a world of the structural forms of matter. Imagine the old paper punch cards from the ancient electronic machines but punch cards with an infinite number of dimensions - so are the dimensions of space, no more and no less. Bringing topology to the physical level is a mistake. The paradox in the understanding is that the punch-card paper is the infinite empty space – the space; the holes that encode information in a punch card are the infinite filled space – the matter; and what arranges and encodes these infinities is the motion. Our world is not energy, it is a world of the structural forms of matter, i.e., even the energy is a structural form of matter, which means that under all possible conditions it is made of three things - matter, space and motion. Annihilation of matter does not exist - we just have an interaction of one structural form of matter with another structural form of it, which gives rise to a third structural form of matter, such as light. None of these three realities - matter, space and motion - is fully known to humans, and, in particular, to modern physics. , I can guarantee it from my point of view. I will repeat myself again - everything written in this exposition are words, which, if not paid with practical experimentation, will remain bare words hanging in space. In the given situation, however, the nice thing is that these words can be verified both as a computer model and a physical experiment. For putting this into effect, you, on whom the development of new ideas depends, need to say "let"s check." When you see the reality and touch the working model and the material proof, you will begin to see the world through my eyes. Then you will truly understand why humanity needs new physics and why the words "open the door to heaven" are not a metaphor. And, as Steve Jobs used to say, let"s get the points together. If he were alive, he would understand. If you try to understand, I will be extremely grateful to you. 
Това е първоначалният текст който им изпратих и ми върнаха с потупване по рамото, че адреса бил друг. Тука мога спокойно да кажа с извинение и без извинение ДА ГО ДУ-Т ................... ОТ НАСА ...................
 

Ако питате питайте само на български ... езиците цинично или не ги обичам само варени, пекани и на супа ...